 |
EXHIBIT TO ATTACH TO CONSTRUCT
Decisions of the
UNITED STATE SUPREME COURT
"There is a clear distinction in this particular case between an individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for examination at the suit of the State. The individual may stand upon the constitutional right as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his own private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due "process of law, "in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U. S. 43.
"The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for mere privilege of existing. The corporation is an artificial entity which owes its existence and charter powers to the State; but, the individual's rights to live and own property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which an excise cannot be imposed." Redfield v. Fisher, 292 P. 813, at 819[91]
"Included in the right of personal liberty and the right of private property--partaking of the nature of each--is the right to make contracts for the acquisition of property. Chief among such contracts is that of personal employment, by which labor and other services are exchanged for money or other forms of property." Coppage v. Kansas, 263 U.S.1, at 14.
"The common business and callings of life, the, ordinary trades and pursuits, which are innocuous in themselves, and which have been followed in all communities from time immemorial, must, therefore, be free in, this country to all alike upon the same conditions. The right to pursue them, without let nor hindrance, except that which, is applied to all persons of the same age, sex, and condition, is a distinguishing privilege of citizens of the United States, and an essential element of that freedom which they claim as their birthright."
Butchers Union Co. V. Crescent City Co.
NOTE: The above Supreme Court decision have never been overturned. Further, Kenneth W. Starr, Solicitor General, on February 1, 1990, made the following statement in a letter to a United State Senator:
"It is well established that the decisions of the United State Supreme Court interpreting federal law binding on lower courts, both state and federal, until such time as the Supreme Court overrules its decision, or federal, statutory provision in question is amended or repealed." (See generally Copper v. Aaron 358 U.S.1).
I shall exert every faculty I possess in aiding to prevent the Constitution from being nullified, destroyed, or impaired; and, even though I should see it fall, I will still, with a voice feeble, perhaps, but earnest as ever issued from human lips, and with fidelity and zeal which nothing shall extinguish, call on the PEOPLE to come to its rescue. Daniel Webster
LAW OF THE LAND
The general misconception is that any statue passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U. S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement! It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statue, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it! An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statue leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statue not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
SIXTEENTH AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE SECOND EDITION, SECTION 177
"A CAVEAT, NOTICE AND DEMAND TO ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS"
You are hereby placed on NOTICE AT LAW that any action you take under "colour of Law" (statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of any states, which is contrary to Constitutional Law), will be cause of action against you for Unlawful Deprivation of Rights and Immunities under Title 42 United States Code, Title 28 United States Code and/or other applicable Federal or State Constitutional Laws.
Amendment V of the United States Constitution guarantees that, "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process
Due process includes a jury trial. Title 18, Paragraph 242 of the United States Criminal Code provides that, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons ...papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated but upon probable cause."
There has been no indictment or presentment by a probable cause jury; therefore, there is no probable cause.
Title 18, Paragraph 241 of the United States Criminal Code mandates that,
"If -- two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the enjoyment of any right...secured to him by the Constitution...or because of his/her having exercised the same...they shall be fined...or imprisoned...or both."
The Attorney General should, take action under the provisions of Title 18, Sections 241 and 242 to assure that all persons are required to answer for their criminal acts provided in the United States Code Title 42, Paragraph 1988.
"Title 18...Shall be exercised and enforced for the protection of all persons...the common law... shall be extended to and governed by the...courts in trial and disposition of the cause, and, if it is of a criminal nature, in the infliction of punishment of the party found guilty."
Unless you are absolutely sure you are seeking to enforce Law, not ''colour of Law" and that you have given proven jurisdiction, not supposed/usurped jurisdiction to act...for you to act otherwise would be foolish...it is highly recommended you verify Law and Jurisdiction before you act.
PAGE -1
"A CAVEAT, NOTICE AND DEMAND TO ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS"
ANY ACTION YOU TAKE UNDER "COLOUR OF LAW" CONTRARY TO LAW, which deprives me of a Right or Immunity, WILL BE EXPENSIVE TO YOU as my rights and immunities are valued at no less than ONE MILLION ($1,000,000.00) DOLLARS EACH. Said "dollars" defined in the Coinage Act of 1792, the Bland-Allison Act and 12 U.S.C.S.152.
I, the undersigned, DEMAND that you, and all persons and agencies acting in concert with you, respect, protect and defend ALL my Rights, Privileges, and Immunities in all particulars in accordance with the oath or affirmation which you undertook in pursuance of Article Six, Paragraph Two of the Constitution for the United States. In absence of proof that you, or those acting with you, have taken said oath/affirmation, clearly you CANNOT have jurisdiction either in personam or in rem.
Subscribed and affirmed this day of
With Explicit Reservation of All Rights,
________________________________________,
"Without Prejudice UCC 1-207"
PAGE
-2-
Certificate of Confidentiality and Non-Use
This agreement, entered into between Clark Lesley Coe, Sr. (founder of Filadelfeeah Youth Developmental Program) and ________________________________________, hereinafter known as Church, Organization, Entity, confirms the terms under which information and material relating to Clark Lesley Coe, Sr. and/DNA Angelina Coe, wife, work of authorship, for the purpose of education, ministering, sharing the key scripture sharing from web-site and book information. Church, Organization, Entity, ________________________________________, hereby agrees that any and all such information and material shared and submitted by Clark Lesley Coe, Sr. and/DNA Angelina Coe, from Filadelfeeah Youth Developmental Program shall be maintained in strict confidence pursuant and shall not be used, sold, assigned, or disclosed to any other person, organization, or corporation without Clark Lesley Coe, Sr. and/DNA Angelina Coe written permission.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
ANY ACTION YOU TAKE UNDER "COLOUR OF LAW" CONTRARY TO LAW, which deprives me of a Right or Immunity, WILL BE EXPENSIVE TO YOU as my rights and immunities are valued at no less than ONE MILLION ($1,000,000.00) DOLLARS EACH. Said "dollars" defined in the Coinage Act of 1792, the Bland-Allison Act and 12 U.S.C.S.152.
I, the undersigned, DEMAND that you, and all persons and agencies acting in concert with you, respect, protect and defend ALL my Rights, Privileges, and Immunities in all particulars in accordance with the oath or affirmation which you undertook in pursuance of Article Six, Paragraph Two of the Constitution for the United States. In absence of proof that you, or those acting with you, have taken said oath/affirmation, clearly you CANNOT have jurisdiction either in personam or in rem.
Subscribed and affirmed this day of
With Explicit Reservation of All Rights,
________________________________________
"Without Prejudice UCC 1-207" 1Cr 6:1 Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints? 2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? 3 Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life? 4 If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church.
OBJETO EXPUESTO A ASOCIAR A LA CONSTRUCCIN
Decisiones del
COURTE TRIBUNAL SUPREMA DEL LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS
"Hay una distincin clara en este caso determinado entre Un individuo y una corporacin, y se el ltimo que no tiene ninguna derecho de rechazar someter sus libros y papeles para la examinacin en el juego del estado. El individuo puede estar parado sobre sus derechos constitucional como ciudadano. Le dan derecho a continuar su propio negocio privado de su propia manera. Su potencia al contrato es ilimitada. l no debe ningn tal deber al estado, puesto que l no recibe nada dejos, ms all?de la proteccin de su vida y propeidad. Sus derechos estn existido por la ley de la pista de mucho antecedente de la organizacin del estado, y se pueden tomar solamente de l por el "proceso debido de la ley," De acuerdo con la constitucin. Entre sus derechos est?una denegacin a se incrimin? y la inmunidad de se y de su propeidad de la detencin o del asimiento excepto bajo autorizacin de la ley. l no debe nada al pblico siempre y cuando l no viola sobre las sus derechas." Hale vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43.
"l individuo, desemejante de la corporacin, no se puede gravar para el privilegio mero de existir. La corporacin es una entidad artificial que debe sus existencia y poteincia te carta al estado; pero, los derechos individuales de vivir y poseer propeidad son derechos naturales para el disfrute de los cuales, una supresin no se puede imponer." Redfield v. Fisher, 292 P. 813, en 819[91 ]
"Incluida en el derecho de la libertad personal y el derecho de propeidad privada -- participacin de la naturaleza de cada uno -- es la derecho de hacer los contratos para la adquisicin de propeidad. El jefe entre tales contratos es el del empleo personal, por el cual el trabajo y otros servicios son intercambiados por dinero u otras formas de propeidad." Coppage v. Kansas, 263 E.E.U.U.1, en 14.
"Los negocios y los llamados comunes de la vida, de los comercios y de las bsquedas, que son inofensivas en s?mismos, y que del ordinario se han seguido en todas las comunidades deste el tiempo inmemorial, necesidad, por lo tanto, esir libres a todos igualmente las mismas condiciones. La derecha de perseguirlos, sin dej?u obstculo, excepto el que, se aplica a todas las personas de la misma edad, sexo, y condicin, es un distingua privilegio de los ciudadanos de los Estados Unidos, y un elemento esencial de esa libertad que l demanda derecho al macer como su birthright."
Butchers Unin Co. V. Crescent City Co.
NOTA: La decisin antedicha del Tribunal Supremo nunca se ha volcado. Adems, Kenneth W. Starr, general del abogado, de febrero el 1 de 1990, hizo la declaracin siguiente en una carta a un senador de los Estados unidos:
"Es establecido que las decisiones de la courte suprema de los Estados Uniototos que interpreta la ley federal que ata en cortes ms bajas, estado y federal, hasta que el la Courte Suprema invalide su decisin, o la disposicin federal, estatutaria en la pregunta se enmienda o se abroga." (Vea generalmente Copper Vs. Aaron358 E.E.U.U.1).
Ejercer?a cada facultad que poseo en ayudar para prevenir la constitucin de ser anulado, destruida, o deteriorada; y, aunque debo verla bajar, yo inmvil, con una voz dbil, quizs, pero serio segn lo publicado siempre de los labios humanos, y con fidelidad y el celo que nada extinguir? invita a GENTE a venir a su rescate. Daniel Webster
LEY DE LA PISTA
La idea falsa general es que cualquier estatua pasada por los legisladores que llevan el aspecto de la ley constituye la ley de la pista. La constitucin de los E.E.U.U. es la ley suprema de la pista, y cualquier estatua para, ser vlida, debe estar en el acuerdo! Es imposible para la constitucin y una ley que la violan para ser vlido; uno debe prevalecer. Esto se indica sucinto como sigue:
La regla general es que una estatua inconstitucional, aunque teniendo la forma y el nombre de la ley, no es en realidad ninguna ley, pero es enteramente vaca, e ineficaz para cualquier propsito; desde inconstitucionalidad fecha a partir de la poca de su promulgacin, y no simplemente a partir de la fecha de la decisin que lo califica tan! Una ley inconstitucional, en la contemplacin legal, es pues inoperante como si nunca hubiera sido pasada. Tal estatua deja la pregunta que pretende resolver apenas pues sera tenido la estatua decretado.
Puesto que una ley inconstitucional es vaca, los principios generales siguen que no impone ningn deber, consulta ningunos derechos, no crea ninguna oficina, no concede ninguna potencia o autoridad en cualquier persona, no produce ninguna proteccin, y no alinea ningn acto realizado bajo l
Un acto vaco no puede ser legalmente constante con una que sea vlido. Una ley inconstitucional no puede funcionar para reemplazar ninguna ley vlida existente. De hecho, en cuanto un estatuto se ejecuta opuestamente a la ley fundamental de la pista, se reemplaza de tal modo. Nadie est?limitado por obedecer una ley inconstitucional y no se limita ningunas cortes para enforsala
DCIMOSEXTA EDICIN AMERICANA DE LA JURISPRUDENCIA SEGUNDA EDICIN, SECCIN 177
"Una Advertencia, Un Aviso Y Una Demanda A Todos los Funcionarios"
Le colocan por este medio en AVISO EN LA LEY que cualquier accin usted toma bajo "el color de la ley" (estatuto, ordenanza, regulacin, costumbre, o el uso de cualquieres estados, que es contrario a los derechos poltico), ser?causa de la accin contra usted para la privacin ilegal de los derechos y las inmunidades bajo ttulo 42 Codigo de los Estados Unidos, titulan 28 Codigo de los Estados Unidos y/o otros leyes constitucionales federales o del estado aplicables.
La enmienda V de la constitucin de Los Estados Unidos garantiza ese, "ninguna persona ser?privada de vida, de libertad, o de caracterstica, sin proceso debido
El proceso debido incluye un ensayo del jurado. El ttulo 18, prrafo 242 del cdigo criminal de Los Estados Unidos proporciona a eso, "el derecho de la gente de sestra seguro en sus papeles personasles..., y los efectos, contra bsquedas y asimientos desrazonables, no sern violados pero sobre causa probables."
No ha habido acusacin o presentacin por un jurado probable de la causa; por lo tanto, no hay causa probable.
Ttulo 18, el prrafo 241 del cdigo criminal de los Estados Unidos asigna eso por mandato,
"Si -- dos o ms personas conspiran daar, oprimen, amenazan, o intimidan a cualquier ciudadano en el disfrute de sus derechos... asegurada por la constitucin... o debido a su que ejercita igual... sern multados... o encarcelados... o ambos."
El abogado general , debe tomar accin bajo provisiones del ttulo 18, secciones 241 y 242 de asegurar que requieren a todas las personas contestar para sus actos criminales proporcionados en el ttulo 42 del cdigo de Los Estados Unidos, prrafo 1988.
El "ttulo 18... ser?ejercitado y hecho cumplir para la proteccin de todas las personas... la ley comn... ser?ampliada a y gobernada por... las cortes en ensayo y la disposicin de la causa, y, si est?de una naturaleza criminal, en el infliction del castigo del partido encontrado culpable."
A menos que usted sea absolutamente seguro usted est?intentando hacer enforcar la ley, no "el color de la ley" y eso usted ha dado la jurisdiccin probada, no la jurisdiccin de supesita/usurped a actuar... para que usted acte de otra manera sera absurda... l altamente se recomienda le verifica ley y la jurisdiccin antes de que usted acte .
PAGINA -1-
""Una Advertencia, Un Aviso Y Una Demanda A Todos los Funcionarios"
CUALQUIER ACCIN que USTED TOME BAJO "COLOR DE LA LEY" CONTRARIO A LA LEY, que me priva de derechos o de una inmunidad, SER?COSTOSO A USTED mientras que mis derechos e inmunidades se valoran en ningunos menos de UN MILLN ($1.000.000,00) DLARES CADA UNO. Los "dlares" dichos definieron en el acto de la invencin de 1792, el acto Bland-Allison y 12 U.S.C.S.152.
Yo, el infrascrito, EXIGE que usted, y todas las personas y agencias actuando en el concierto con usted, respecto, protejan y defiende TODAS mis derechos, privilegios, e inmunidades en todos los detalles de acuerdo con el juramento o la afirmacin que usted emprendi?en la prosecucin del artculo seises, prrafo dos de la constitucin de los Estados Unidos. En la ausencia de la prueba que usted, o sos actuando con usted, ha tomado a horamenta/affirmacin dicho, claramente usted NO PUEDE tener jurisdiccin en personam o en el retiro
Suscrito y afirmado este da de
Con la reservacin explcita de todos los derechos,
________________________________________,
"Sin UCC 1-207 Del Prejudicar"
Pagina
-2-
DISCLAIMER:
Web sites linking to Filadelfeeah Youth Developmental Program Web site (Filadelfeeah) do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Filadelfeeah Youth Developmental Program nor does it represent any type of affiliation. However, Filadelfeeah Youth Developmental Program can be characteristically found in the fellowshipping body at-large.
|
